$MET Meteora Discover (2H view): the TVL change column contradicts other columns in the same row.

Checked 6 Oct 2026 (~03:30 UTC) on app.meteora.ag, Discover → Top Performers, 2H, no wallet connected.

STONK-SOL (DLMM, bin step 20):

- TVL $2.58M, +101%; Active TVL $2.51M, +99.13%

- Net Deposit -$214.87K, pool price +4.91%

- Fees -24.55%, while Fees/Active TVL +76.11%

Two things don't add up. TVL can't double in two hours while LPs withdraw $215K and the price moves 5%. And if fees fell 24.55% while Fees/Active TVL rose 76.11%, Active TVL must have fallen about 57%, not risen 99%.

Same pattern on ZCAT-SOL (bin step 80): Net Deposit -$137.9K, price -9.84%, yet TVL +78.92%; Fees -65.88% vs Fees/Active TVL +37.11% implies Active TVL about -75%, shown as +91.96%. ALLINU-SOL shows it too, and most rows on the page show TVL around +80-100% for the window.

LPs use these columns to pick pools, so a wrong TVL trend makes a pool look like it is attracting liquidity while it is losing it.

Suggestion: check the baseline used for the TVL / Active TVL change (it looks like the comparison value is far too low, or the direction is flipped), and add a tooltip saying what each % is compared against.

Question: is the 2H TVL change computed against the value at the start of the window, or against something else, like an average over the previous window?

(Researched with AI assistance; numbers taken from the page on 6 Oct 2026.)

$KMNO Kamino Earn: the RockawayX EUROP vault page shows history the vault doesn't have yet.

On https://kamino.com/earn/lend/rockawayx-europ/vault-overview (checked 6 Oct 2026, no wallet connected):

- Deployment Date: 7 September 2026, about 29 days ago.

- Yet the page shows "Supply APY (90D Avg) 0.25%" and a "180D Growth" figure.

- Total Supplied $4.49M, Total Borrowed about $352, Utilization 0.01%, current Supply APY 0.00%.

- Interest Generated across all users: +$0.04.

0.25% a year on $4.49M would be roughly $890 over 29 days, so the 90D average doesn't describe what depositors in this vault actually earned. Kamino's docs say quoted APYs are trailing averages, but don't say what is shown when a vault is younger than the window.

Smaller point: the vault is labelled "Balanced" while its own strategy text calls it "conservative", and I couldn't find where Conservative / Balanced / Aggressive are defined in the docs.

Suggestion: for vaults younger than a window, show "since launch (29 days)" instead of 90D/180D, and add a note when utilization is near zero ("little borrow demand yet; second market coming").

Question: is the 90D figure taken from the Schuman EUROP Prime Market's history before this vault existed?

(Researched with AI assistance; numbers re-checked on 6 Oct 2026.)