$MET is a gem! I checked MET on-chain before trusting the labels on this page, and two of them I can't interpret or reproduce.

What's verified: both the mint authority and the freeze authority are renounced (None / None), and total supply is 997,732,177.39 MET. So the ~$379M market cap here is total supply x price, i.e. fully diluted. That confirms @alessiosol's suspicion from yesterday: the docs put roughly 480M circulating at TGE, so FDV is doing a lot of work in a number most readers will take as float value.

Two labels I couldn't act on:

1. "Entropy 0.261". The FAQ says the 0-100 score is computed from price performance, holder distribution, trading volume and community activity - but "Entropy" isn't defined anywhere I could find, so the score can't be reproduced. Is it a Gini, a top-10 share, or an entropy over holder buckets? And are AMM pool vaults excluded? On a token whose liquidity sits in DLMM bins, vault balances are not whales, and including them would move the number a lot.

2. "Gem Hunters Sentiment: Gem 52% / Rug 48%". On a token with both mint and freeze authority renounced, a 48% rug reading is surprising enough that I want to know what it measures - how many wallets voted, over what window, and what a "Rug" vote means here (contract risk? price? team?). If it's a handful of votes, presenting it as two large percentages beside a 75/100 score implies far more signal than exists.

Smaller one: the token list shows $2.82M of 24h volume for MET, while across the 30 MET pairs on DexScreener I measure about $19.2M - including $8.7M in a single MET/JUP pool holding only ~$200k of liquidity. If that row is scoped to DAMM v2 pools only, it doesn't say so, and someone screening by volume would read MET as roughly 7x less traded than it is.

(On-chain figures read from the Solana RPC, DEX figures from DexScreener, with AI assistance on the data collection.)