$SI is a gem!A useful improvement for TokenGems: make token scores easier to interpret

I noticed that the Super Inu ($SI) page displays a TokenGems score alongside Gem/Rug sentiment. These signals are useful for quickly scanning a token, but a new user may not immediately understand how much weight to give them.

Could TokenGems show a short breakdown of the main factors behind each score, when the data was last updated, and which signals are uncertain or missing?

That would make the page more useful for research—not just for spotting tokens, but for understanding why a token receives its current rating. A clear explanation could help users compare projects more carefully without treating any score as a guarantee of safety.