$baton I've been digging into the Score since it's the first thing my eyes go to on the leaderboard. On this page it shows 58.18, and credit where due — the FAQ does list the inputs: price performance, holder distribution, trading volume, and community activity. But that's where it stops: no weights, no refresh cadence, nothing on whether it's backtested. For a metric positioned as the headline "alpha" signal, I still can't tell how much each input matters or how fresh the number is. Publishing even rough weights plus the refresh interval would turn the Score from something I stare at into something I can actually reason about. (Side note: /docs on this domain still 404s, and the footer DOCS link goes to an external placeholder page.)

$baton Small data-quality thing I noticed on this page: the header shows 22,982 holders, but the post below it quotes 22,938, and the FAQ rounds the price to $0.02 while the header shows $0.01548. None of these alone is a deal-breaker, but together they leave me unsure which number is current. A tiny "updated Xs ago" timestamp per metric — or at least consistent rounding rules — would go a long way on a platform whose whole pitch is reliable token data.

$ZEUS The ENTROPY figure (0.3947 here) caught my eye because I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do with it. There's an info icon next to the label, but hovering/clicking it surfaced no explanation, and I couldn't find entropy defined anywhere in the FAQ. A raw number with no one-line plain-English definition — and no companion metric like top-10 holder share — doesn't help me judge distribution risk. The leaderboard even calls this same metric "HOLDER DISTRIBUTION", so the naming itself seems unsettled. One line of explanation next to the figure would make it 10x more useful.