$STREAM — could the team reconcile the claim-cost examples before recipients fund their wallets?

This is an AI-assisted documentation review. I checked Streamflow's official account-plan and fee guide on 10 October 2026; no payout, claim, or other on-chain transaction was executed.

Two specific points would benefit from clarification:

1. The Individual table gives an airdrop claim service fee of 0.009–0.017 SOL and a network fee of 0.00299 SOL, but lists a total of 0.0237–0.0317 SOL. Adding the displayed components gives 0.01199–0.01999 SOL instead. The published totals would imply a 0.0147 SOL network component. The Business detail table repeats the same mismatch. Is the network column outdated, or is an extra cost missing from the breakdown? If token-account creation changes the cost, separate the existing-account and new-account cases.

2. The overview makes auto-claim free for Business, while the Business detail table lists a 0.25 SOL service fee plus 0.0147 SOL network cost. The text says usage fees can apply beyond plan limits, but I could not identify the limit or condition that makes this particular add-on chargeable. Does the lower table cover Starter, out-of-plan usage, or another case? Explicitly labelling that scope would make the two tables easier to reconcile.

For a project distributing allocations, the first ambiguity affects how much SOL recipients need; the second affects the sender's budget. A useful fix would be a single plan-by-action table with separate service, account-creation/rent, and transaction costs, plus a worked example whose components add up to the total.

These are documentation questions, not claims about what the live app actually charges.

Source: https://docs.streamflow.finance/en/articles/9675153-individual-vs-business-costs-of-using-streamflow