baton $baton

$baton  Looked through the overview and on-chain metrics:

Entropy & Holder Distribution: The token currently shows a 0.6138 entropy score across 22,938 holders with a $16.24M market cap, yet the sentiment gauge sits split 50/50 between Gem and Rug. For high-velocity tokens, surfacing the top 10 holder concentration percentage alongside entropy would give retail traders clearer risk context before swapping.

2. Trade Tab UX: When switching over to the Trade tab on desktop Safari, it requires an external routing confirmation rather than displaying an inline quote with estimated slippage.

Question for the team: Is an automated Raydium/Jupiter direct routing integration planned to execute swaps directly without leaving the token card?

like this?

$baton I've been digging into the Score since it's the first thing my eyes go to on the leaderboard. On this page it shows 58.18, and credit where due — the FAQ does list the inputs: price performance, holder distribution, trading volume, and community activity. But that's where it stops: no weights, no refresh cadence, nothing on whether it's backtested. For a metric positioned as the headline "alpha" signal, I still can't tell how much each input matters or how fresh the number is. Publishing even rough weights plus the refresh interval would turn the Score from something I stare at into something I can actually reason about. (Side note: /docs on this domain still 404s, and the footer DOCS link goes to an external placeholder page.)

$baton Small data-quality thing I noticed on this page: the header shows 22,982 holders, but the post below it quotes 22,938, and the FAQ rounds the price to $0.02 while the header shows $0.01548. None of these alone is a deal-breaker, but together they leave me unsure which number is current. A tiny "updated Xs ago" timestamp per metric — or at least consistent rounding rules — would go a long way on a platform whose whole pitch is reliable token data.