Insurance
Insure your digital assets with DeFi insurance tokens. Protect against smart contract risks.
$GREEN has led the category 3 days running this week
$GREEN +11 places this week
$GREEN climbed into the category leaders this week
$SLT climbed 5 places this week
Up 104.4% this week, $COVER is gaining ground
$COVER · 9 gem score this week
14 tokens rose and 2 fell this week
$BRIGHT +46.3% this month
@sneilRWA+1•3$ONyc : OnRe's sitemap sends Google to 7 blog posts that return 404, including "The truth about OnRe"
I build websites, so I crawled all 103 URLs in onre.finance/sitemap.xml and checked status codes, titles, descriptions and preview images.
Most of the site is in good shape. The homepage and the main pages have proper titles, descriptions and preview images, every page has a canonical tag, and nothing is accidentally set to noindex.
What I found:
1) Seven blog URLs in the sitemap return "Page Not Found":
/blog/the-truth-about-onre
/blog/choosing-an-onyc-yield-strategy
/blog/onycs-best-use-case
/blog/the-onre-market-on-kamino-one-year-of-growth
/blog/understanding-solanas-onchain-yield-coin
/blog/where-models-end-and-underwriting-begins
/blog/from-yield-chasing-to-collateral-grade-assets
Google keeps hitting these from the sitemap, and anyone who saved or shared one of those links lands on a dead page. For a yield product, a missing post called "The truth about OnRe" looks worse than it probably is.
2) /resources/style-system is public and listed in the sitemap. It looks like Webflow's internal style guide page, with no description, and it shouldn't be indexed.
3) The five blog category pages (/blog-category/announcements, ecosystem, education, insights, partnerships) are all titled just "OnRe", with no description and no preview image. In search results and link previews they are impossible to tell apart.
4) The three legal pages spell the brand "On Re" in their titles ("Privacy Policy | On Re"), while the rest of the site uses "OnRe".
5) The "ONyc Launches on Kamino" post has 4 H1 headings and the Loopscale vault post has 2. Every other page has one.
Suggestions: republish the seven posts or 301 them to the closest live article, and if the Webflow sitemap is auto-generated, it should pick up the change after the next publish. Turn off "Include in sitemap" and indexing for the style guide page. Add a title and description template to the blog category collection, for example "Announcements | OnRe". Fix the "On Re" spelling and use one H1 per post.
Question: were these seven posts unpublished on purpose? If any of them were replaced by newer ones, pointing the old URLs at the new posts would keep their links working.
@SfddhsdRWA+1•1$ONyc NAV is a fixed 11.02% curve. Where do claims show up?
I pulled OnRe's NAV feed (core.api.onre.finance/data/nav, 501 daily rows) and checked it against the docs.
NAV follows a set rate, not a valuation. Since 19 Sep 2026 every daily step is exactly x1.00028645, which annualises to 11.02% and matches live-apy (0.1102). Early September gives 11.54%. That fits the Token Configuration page (NAV = base price + annual rate + time). But the FAQ says NAV moves with "claims, reserving", and also that excess claims are absorbed in APY "while NAV stays protected". The feed shows four NAV drops in July 2025 and none since 1 Aug 2025. So in practice, losses only show up as rate cuts. Who sets the annual rate, and what caused the cut from 11.54% to 11.02%? A public log of pricing-vector changes, with reasons, would help lenders like Kamino price this risk.
Mint supply over RPC is 253,321,198 ONyc, but the API reports 247,969,168 circulating. A 5.35M gap (~$6.2M). The integration guide mentions a "circulating-supply excluded balance" PDA but doesn't say which accounts it covers.
One docs page calls app redemptions atomic with no queue. The integration guide calls them request-based and asynchronous, and its link to the Redemptions page is a dead "broken://" link.
What I checked: docs, NAV/APY/TVL API, Solana RPC mint reads. No deposit or redemption made.
Token | Price | 1d % ▲▼ | 1w % ▲▼ | 1m % ▲▼ | Market Cap ▲▼ | Volume 24h ▲▼ | Score ▲▼ | Category | Holders ▲▼ | Holder Distribution ▲▼ | Mc/Rev ▲▼ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GreenGREEN | $0.00008892 | 6.3% | 23.9% | 30.1% | $4.18M | $25,259 | 69.48 | 12,218 | 0.7269 | – | |
Wrapped NXMwNXM | $59.95 | 0.1% | -10.3% | -11.2% | $23.40M | $178,474 | 69.09 | Wrapped+1 | 5,027 | 0.4425 | – |
OnRe Tokenized ReinsuranceONyc | $1.157 | -0.0% | -0.0% | 0.8% | $196.03M | $2.58M | 66.52 | RWA+1 | 9,330 | 0.2438 | – |
ReRE | $0.3744 | -1.3% | -4.3% | -18.9% | $132.42M | $206.25 | 59.6 | 10,038 | 0.2086 | 813.81 | |
SLTSLT | $3.42 | 1.8% | 8.2% | 6.9% | $346.19M | $22,529 | 58.8 | Utility+2 | 15,608 | 0.2288 | – |
insuranceinsurance | $93.19 | 1.2% | -2.9% | -11.8% | $9.32B | $4,603 | 57.15 | Utility+1 | 56,026 | 0.0061 | – |
Nexus MutualNXM | $59.12 | -0.5% | -5.2% | -13.0% | $92.96M | $0 | 55.76 | Utility+1 | 3,795 | 0.2903 | 57.93 |
NaymsNAYM | $0.00003779 | – | – | -5.0% | $13,640 | $1.28 | 48.61 | RWA+1 | 5,574 | 0.2513 | – |
NsureNSURE | $0.0006335 | 0.6% | -6.5% | -13.3% | $40,180 | $63.78 | 47.04 | Utility+1 | 2,838 | 0.394 | – |
Bridge MutualBMI | $0.0003113 | 0.4% | -20.2% | -18.8% | $49,951 | $0.0221 | 46.43 | 11,253 | 0.4222 | – | |
LunosUNO | $0.00002881 | 0.0% | -2.9% | -6.3% | $6,669 | $0 | 45.63 | Utility+1 | 4,263 | 0.4586 | – |
Cover ProtocolCOVER | $0.141 | – | -9.7% | -19.8% | $5,745,195.78T | $3.037 | 42.6 | 6,078 | 0 | – | |
GrowGROW | $0.0004607 | -4.8% | 55.3% | 279.1% | $107.25M | $101,728 | 38.21 | 8,081 | 0.5676 | – | |
Bright UnionBRIGHT | $0.000433 | – | – | -18.3% | $47,686 | $1.999 | 30.37 | 1,079 | 0.3031 | – | |
ArmorARMOR | $0.0002002 | 1.4% | -5.3% | -11.2% | $144,510 | $6.599 | 29.23 | 14,882 | 0.1531 | – | |
首个保险拖底机制币安314 | $0.05576 | – | -2.9% | – | $5,736 | $0 | 13.88 | 273 | 0.0968 | – |
Frequently asked questions
How has Insurance performed recently?
The DeFi Insurance category shows broad positive movement over both 7-day and 30-day windows, with 11 tokens seeing upward momentum against 3 experiencing downward trends. Wrapped NXM (wNXM) stands out as the streak leader, maintaining its position for 5 days in both periods, and also holds the highest score of 69.1084 over 7 days and 69.4964 over 30 days. Cover Protocol (COVER) demonstrated significant growth, climbing in rank by 2 positions and achieving substantial score percentage increases of 108.3% over 7 days and 120.1% over 30 days. SLT also advanced, with a rank delta of 4 over 7 days and 5 over 30 days. Conversely, Armor (ARMOR) was a notable faller, dropping 6 ranks in both periods with score percentage decreases of -43.7% and -42.9% respectively.
What are DeFi insurance tokens?
DeFi insurance tokens represent a stake in a decentralized insurance protocol. Holders often participate in governance and may earn rewards for providing capital to cover potential claims.
How do DeFi insurance protocols work?
DeFi insurance protocols allow users to purchase coverage against various risks in the decentralized finance space, such as smart contract vulnerabilities or stablecoin de-pegging. The premiums collected and capital provided by token holders are used to pay out valid claims.
What types of risks can DeFi insurance cover?
DeFi insurance can cover a range of risks, including smart contract hacks, oracle failures, stablecoin de-pegging, and even certain exchange hacks, depending on the specific protocol and policy.
What are the benefits of using DeFi insurance?
Benefits include protecting your digital assets from unforeseen events, decentralization of risk assessment and claims processing, and potential for yield generation for those who provide capital to the insurance pools.
How do I choose a reliable DeFi insurance token or protocol?
When choosing a DeFi insurance token or protocol, consider factors such as the protocol's track record, the types of risks it covers, the size of its coverage pools, its audit history, and the reputation of its community and team.