Post by Nuancee about Switch Board ($SWCH)

  • User Avatar
    @NuanceeUtility+1•3

    I explored your request lifecycle and noticed that Switch Board doesn’t simply route each request to the cheapest model. It combines price, latency, measured reliability and provider stake, then can fail over to another provider when a request fails. I like the attempt to balance cost with reliability. How do you prevent the staking component from becoming too influential in the auction, where a provider with a large $SWCH bond could consistently outperform a technically better provider offering lower prices or better measured performance?